Hope and Help for the chronic “Breaker”
-You know, a REAL Food Addict
"Brain circuitry works on a dopamine-mediated reward system—eating, restricting, and purging are flawed attempts to experience that reward."
—Diane Schwartz
"I believe that the high incidence of relapse with alcoholics and drug addicts (food addicts) is due to the fact that they never fully get clean. They continue to use by substituting any of the major triggering substances (even abstinent foods) for alcohol and/or drugs and therefore remain in craving. High on the list: sugar, artificial sweeteners, flour products, refined carbohydrates like breakfast cereals, high-fat crunchy and/or salty snacks, caffeinated drinks, gums, mints, candies, energy bars—in short, foods or beverages that perpetuate a dopamine reward-craving cycle. What’s left? Wholesome, natural foods that are unadulterated and unrefined, delivering optimal satiety."
—Dr. Ronald Hoffman, The Big Book of True Recovery from Food Addiction and Beyond: It's Not Broccoli
We have come to believe that a real food addict is as hopeless a case as the real alcoholic that the Big Book speaks about. We are powerless to maintain abstinence indefinitely without the help of a power greater than ourselves. We'd had countless vain attempts to get and stay abstinent but were are powerless. We believe that there is hope for the food addict who follows the identical path as is laid out in the Big Book of Alcoholics.
You can not only experience lasting abstinence from addictive eating but also be placed by your Higher Power into the place of neutrality, safe and protected. Your joy will be restored and you will no longer fight addiction. You can be recovered and can stay recovered so long as you do not neglect the spiritual part of the program by staying plugged into a Higher Power that can arrest your addiction. We have found that this course of action works and that not only have chronic breakers gotten abstinent from addictive eating but our Higher Power is continuing to do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. This is our experience. Every food addict who has followed this plan has stayed abstinent to the writing of this article… There may be future exceptions.
Sound Familiar?
It is Friday at your stressful job; a coworker humiliates you in a meeting in front of all your coworkers. You go home Friday evening and eat your abstinent meal, but stay up late scrolling on your phone instead of doing a step 11 daily review and dealing with your resentments before you call it a day. Saturday, you’re tired because you were up late soothing your emotions on your phone. Family invites you to a noon movie with a late lunch afterward. You've eaten an abstinent but typical high-carb breakfast of low fat yogurt, blueberries and oatmeal. You didnt get enough protein and you didnt get enough fat to satiate hunger PLUS you got too many carbs which, spikes and crashes blood sugar. You arrive at the theater hungry and smell the popcorn. You rationalize: “Corn is in my lunch; I’ll make this my cooked veg.” You buy popcorn (a trifecta of fat, salt, carbs) and make plans to eat half. Then you proceed to eat the whole bag and half your partners’s bucket. Next morning you either confess to your sponsor or rationalize: “Popcorn isn’t so bad.”
That tells us you
- don’t fully understand food addiction
- haven’t had a spiritual experience
- aren’t in a position of neutrality
- aren’t yet willing to go to any length to protect it.
You start dabbling with food, trigger the allergy, and you’re off to the races. That’s food addiction logic.
There is a Solution Ch 2
The Solution, The Answer, The Truth
(The Big Book adapted for food addiction in italics)
Pg 18
We hope this volume will inform and comfort those who are, or who may be affected. There are many.
Highly competent psychiatrists who have dealt with us have found it sometimes impossible to persuade a food addict to discuss his situation without reserve. Strangely enough, wives, parents and intimate friends usually find us even more unapproachable than do the psychiatrist and the doctor.
But the recovered food addict who has found this solution, who is properly armed with facts about themselves, can generally win the entire confidence of another food addict in a few hours. Until such an understanding is reached, little or nothing can be accomplished.
That the person who is making the approach has had the same difficulty, that they obviously know what they are talking about, that their whole deportment shouts at the new prospect that they are an individual with a real answer, that they have no attitude of Holier Than Thou, nothing whatever except the sincere desire to be helpful; that there are no fees to pay, no axes to grind, no people to please, no lectures to be endured—these are the conditions
PAGE 19
we have found most effective. After such an approach many take up their beds and walk again.
None of us makes a sole vocation of this work, nor do we think its effectiveness would be increased if we did. We feel that elimination of our addictive eating is but a beginning. A much more important demonstration of our principles lies before us in our respective homes, occupations and affairs. All of us spend much of our spare time in the sort of effort which we are going to describe.A few are fortunate enough to be so situated that they can give nearly all their time to the work.
If we keep on the way we are going there is little doubt that much good will result, but the surface of the problem would hardly be scratched. Those of us who live in large cities are overcome by the reflection that close by hundreds are dropping into oblivion every day. Many could recover if they had the opportunity we have enjoyed. How then shall we present that which has been so freely given us?
We have concluded to publish an anonymous volume setting forth the problem as we see it. We shall bring to the task our combined experience and knowledge. This should suggest a useful program for anyone concerned with a food related problem.
Of necessity there will have to be discussion of matters medical, psychiatric, social, and religious. We are aware that these matters are, from their very nature, controversial. Nothing would please us so much as to write a book which would contain no basis for contention or argument. We shall do our utmost to achieve that ideal.
Most of us sense that real tolerance of other people’s shortcomings and viewpoints and a respect for their opinions are attitudes which make us
PAGE 20
more useful to others. Our very lives, as neutral food addicts, depend upon our constant thought of others and how we may help meet their needs.
You may already have asked yourself why it is that all of us became so very ill from addictive eating. Doubtless you are curious to discover how and why, in the face of expert opinion to the contrary, we have recovered from a hopeless condition of mind and body. If you are a food addict who wants to get over it, you may already be asking—“What do I have to do?”
It is the purpose of this book to answer such questions specifically. We shall tell you what we have done. Before going into a detailed discussion, it may be well to summarize some points as we see them. How many times people have said to us: “I can take it or leave it alone. Why can’t he?” “Why don’t you eat like a gentleman or quit?” “That fellow can’t handle his food.” “Why don’t you try low fat or sugar free?” “Lay off the rich foods.” “His will power must be weak.” “He could stop if he wanted to.” “She’s such a sweet girl, I should think he’d stop for her sake.” “The doctor told him that if he ever ate addictively again it would kill him, but there he is shoveling it down again.”
Now these are commonplace observations on food addicts which we hear all the time. Back of them is a world of ignorance and misunderstanding. We see that these expressions refer to people whose reactions are very different from ours.
Moderate eaters have little trouble in giving up certain foods entirely if they have good reason for it. They can take it or leave it alone.
Then we have a certain type of food addict. He may have the habit badly enough to gradually impair
PAGE 21
them physically and mentally. It may cause them to die a few years before their time. If a sufficiently strong reason—ill health, falling in love, change of environment, or the warning of a doctor—becomes operative, this person can also stop or moderate, although they may find it difficult and troublesome and may even need medical attention.
But what about the real food addict? They may start off as a moderate eater; they may or may not become a continuous over eater; but at some stage of their eating career they begin to lose all control of their food consumption, once they start to eat.
Here is the person who has been puzzling you, especially in their lack of control. They do absurd, incredible, tragic things while eating. They are a real Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. They are seldom mildly eating. They are always more or less insanely numbed out. Their disposition while eating addictively resembles their normal nature but little. They may be one of the finest folks in the world. Yet let them binge for a day, and they frequently become disgustingly, and even dangerously anti-social. They have a positive genius for getting tight at exactly the wrong moment, particularly when some important decision must be made or engagement kept. They are often perfectly sensible and well balanced concerning everything except eating, but in that respect they are incredibly dishonest and selfish. They often possesse special abilities, skills, and aptitudes, and have a promising career ahead of them. They use their gifts to build up a bright outlook for their family and themselves, and then pull the structure down on their head with a senseless series of binges. They are the fellow who goes to bed so numbed out they ought to sleep the clock around. Yet early next
PAGE 22
morning they search madly through the trash for the leftovers they threw out the night before. If they can afford it, they may have packages concealed all over the house to be certain no one gets their entire supply away from them to throw in the dumpster. As matters grow worse, they begin to use a combination of antidepressants and binge foods to quiet their nerves so they can go to work. Then comes the day when they simply cannot make it and pick up all over again. Perhaps they go to a doctor who gives them anti anxiety drugs or some anti-depressant with which to taper off. Then they begin to appear at hospitals and maybe even a treatment center.
This is by no means a comprehensive picture of the true food addict, as our behavior patterns vary. But this description should identify them roughly.
Why does they behave like this? If hundreds of experiences have shown them that one bite, one lick, one taste means another debacle with all its attendant suffering and humiliation, why is it they take that first bite? Why can’t they stay obstinate? What has become of the common sense and will power that they still sometimes display with respect to other matters?
Perhaps there never will be a full answer to these questions. Opinions vary considerably as to why the food addict reacts differently from normal people.
We are not sure why, once a certain point is reached, little can be done for them. We cannot answer the riddle. We know that while the food addict keeps away from binge foods, as they may do for months or years, they react much like other folks We are equally positive that once they take a bite whatever into their system, something happens, both in the bodily and mental sense, which makes it virtually impossible for them to
PAGE 23
stop. The experience of any food addict will abundantly confirm this.
These observations would be academic and pointless if our friend never took the bite, thereby setting the terrible cycle in motion. Therefore, the main problem of the food addicted person centers in their mind, rather than in their body. If you ask them why they started on that last binge, the chances are they will offer you any one of a hundred alibis. Sometimes these excuses have a certain plausibility, but none of them really makes sense in the light of the havoc a food addict’s eating bout creates. They sound like the philosophy of the person who, having a headache, beats themselves on the head with a hammer so that they can’t feel the ache. If you draw this fallacious reasoning to the attention of a food addict, they will laugh it off, or become irritated and refuse to talk.
Once in a while they may tell the truth. And the truth, strange to say, is usually that they have no more idea why they took that first bite than you have. Some food addicts have excuses with which they are satisfied part of the time. But in their hearts they really do not know why they do it. Once this malady has a real hold, they are a baffled lot. There is the obsession that somehow, someday, they will beat the game. But they often suspect they are down for the count.
How true this is, few realize. In a vague way their families and friends sense that these folks are abnormal, but everybody hopefully awaits the day when the sufferer will rouse themselves from their lethargy and assert their power of will.
The tragic truth is that if the man be a real food addict, the happy day may not arrive. He has lost
PAGE 24
control. At a certain point in the life of every food addict, he passes into a state where the most powerful desire to stop eating addictively is of absolutely no avail. This tragic situation has already arrived in practically every case long before it is suspected.
The fact is that most food addicts, for reasons yet obscure, have lost the power of choice in eating addictively. Our so-called will power becomes practically nonexistent. We are unable, at certain times, to bring into our consciousness with sufficient force the memory of the suffering and humiliation of even a week or a month ago. We are without defense against the first bite.
The almost certain consequences that follow taking even a taste do not crowd into the mind to deter us. If these thoughts occur, they are hazy and readily supplanted with the old threadbare idea that this time we shall handle ourselves like other people. There is a complete failure of the kind of defense that keeps one from putting his hand on a hot stove.
The food addict may say to himself in the most casual way, “It won’t burn me this time, so here’s how!” Or perhaps he doesn’t think at all. How often have some of us begun to eat in this nonchalant way, and after the third or fourth portion , pounded on the table and said to ourselves, “For God’s sake, how did I ever get started again?” Only to have that thought supplanted by “Well, I’ll stop with the sixth plate.” Or “What’s the use anyhow?”
When this sort of thinking is fully established in an individual with addictive tendencies, he has probably placed himself beyond human aid, and unless locked up, may die or go permanently insane. These stark and ugly facts have been confirmed by legions of
PAGE 25
food addicts throughout history. But for the grace of God, there would have been thousands more convincing demonstrations. So many want to stop but cannot.
There is a solution. Almost none of us liked the self-searching, the leveling of our pride, the confession of shortcomings which the process requires for its successful consummation. But we saw that it really worked in others, and we had come to believe in the hopelessness and futility of life as we had been living it. When, therefore, we were approached by those in whom the problem had been solved, there was nothing left for us but to pick up the simple kit of spiritual tools laid at our feet. We have found much of heaven and we have been rocketed into a fourth dimension of existence of which we had not even dreamed.
The great fact is just this, and nothing less: That we have had deep and effective spiritual experiences* which have revolutionized our whole attitude toward life, toward our fellows and toward God’s universe. The central fact of our lives today is the absolute certainty that our Creator has entered into our hearts and lives in a way which is indeed miraculous. He has commenced to accomplish those things for us which we could never do by ourselves.
If you are as seriously addicted as we were, we believe there is no middle-of-the-road solution. We were in a position where life was becoming impossible, and if we had passed into the region from which there is no return through human aid, we had but two alternatives: One was to go on to the bitter end, blotting out the consciousness of our intolerable situation as best we could; and the other, to accept spiritual help. This we did because we honestly wanted to, and were willing to make the effort.
The Real Food Addict is doomed to fail in abstinence alone
In Chapter 4 "We Agnostics" we find the second part-- the addicted brain that problem eaters don't have to deal with: (Page 28)
IS THIS ME?
"We had to ask ourselves why we shouldn’t apply to our human problems this same readiness to change our point of view. We were having trouble with
- personal relationships,
- we couldn’t control our emotional natures,
- we were a prey to misery and depression,
- we couldn’t make a living,
- we had a feeling of uselessness,
- we were full of fear,
- we were unhappy,
- we couldn’t seem to be of real help to other
people
—was not a basic solution of these bedevilments more important than whether we should see newsreels of lunar flight? Of course it was."
These are eight key reasons taken from "We Agnostics" why a strict and abstinent food plan will ultimately fail the real food addict. For the real food addict, food is not the problem—it is the solution, a means to numb the pain associated with these eight overwhelming challenges. Removing the comfort provided by food can lead to severe distress. Strict adherence to abstinence only intensifies feelings by removing the anesthetic effect of food. Ultimately, these eight problems will demand a spiritual solution that cannot be resolved by a rigid food plan, rules, or tools.
Steps 1-3
- We admitted we were powerless over alcohol (food)—that our lives had become unmanageable.
- Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
- Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
page 31 of the Big Book of Alcoholics Anonymous
How is the Real Food Addict Different from the Problem Eater?
Problem Eater
Problem eaters have a singular issue— weight. Whether over-weight or under, the problem resolves itself once the foods causing the problem are fixed. The primary struggle is physical and dietary. Abstinence provides the solution they need. They ONLY need a good dietary solution. Many people with long-term abstinence in program fall into this category. They maintain abstinence because it effectively addresses their weight concerns: weight problem solved. They have never experienced the second part of the real food addict's problem, the mental obsession- which defines true food addiction. Having long-term weight loss and back to back abstinence resulting in a healthy body weight for years does not automatically qualify someone as a real food addict.
Real Food Addict
For the real food addict, the problem goes far beyond weight because weight is not the problem. The problem, the peculiar mental obsession, remains even after the offending food is removed. Long periods of abstinence, are insufficient for the recovery of a real food addict. They must do far deeper work to address the underlying delusions, obsessions, compulsions, and emotional attachments soothed by addictive eating. For them, abstinence will only solve their weight problems for a short period of time. They must address the relentless mental and emotional turmoil that defines true food addiction. The gift of recovery is only received from a Higher Power. The action of turning their will over to a power greater than themselves will result in this gift, a miraculous delivery from addiction.
Triggering the Allergy Can Cause an Allergic Reaction up to TWO WEEKS after the event of triggering the allergy
A Bite, lick or taste at an earlier date can trigger a craving for up to TWO WEEKS for a food addicted person depending on cycles in the individual's gut biome.
https://zoe.com/learn/food-cravings
Foods with a high glycemic index (GI)
spike blood sugar levels because they are rapidly digested by the body, causing a quick release of glucose into the bloodstream, which triggers a large insulin response from the pancreas to bring blood sugar levels back down, leading to a rapid rise and then drop in blood sugar levels; in contrast, low GI foods are digested more slowly, resulting in a gradual rise in blood sugar and a smaller insulin response.
Key points about the glycemic index and blood sugar reactivity:
Fast digestion:
High GI abstinent foods like grains, juices, root vegetables, potatoes, and rice break down quickly during digestion, allowing glucose to enter the bloodstream rapidly.
Insulin surge:
This sudden influx of glucose prompts the pancreas to release a large amount of insulin to process the sugar, causing a "spike" in blood sugar levels.
Blood sugar crash:
Once the insulin efficiently removes the glucose from the blood, blood sugar levels can drop quickly, potentially leading to cravings and feelings of hunger or fatigue.
Fiber content:
Vegetables with high fiber content, brocoli, leafy greens, artichokes, brussels sprouts and legumes, tend to have a lower GI because fiber slows down the digestion process.
Factors affecting a food's glycemic index:
Processing level: Highly processed foods including low fat foods often have a higher GI than a base of proteins and vegetables, supplimented with fruits and limited quantities of whole grains.
Sugar content: Foods with added sugars including fruit juice generally have a higher GI.
Cooking method: How a food is cooked can impact its GI
Suggestions to manage blood sugar levels with the glycemic index:
Choose low GI foods:
Prioritize lean protein sources, low glycemic vegetables, legumes, dairy, fruits high in fiber and limited whole grains.
Pair high GI foods with fiber:
Combine high GI foods like rice, potatoes, root vegetables and whole grains with high fiber vegetables to slow down the absorption of sugar.
Consider portion sizes:
Even low GI foods can cause blood sugar spikes if consumed in sufficent quantities
The Glycemic Index - What causes cravings?
Learn the mechanics of how physical component of food addiction works
The Higher the glycemic index, The higher the intensity and frequency of cravings
The FDA has NO daily requirement on carbohydrates...They are not necessary.
Always remember:
** Read the labels- Various sugars are added to many healthy foods making them a no go for the food addict
** This is by no means a comprehensive list and does not include additives to items by different brand food distributors
** Sugars should be 5th or more in the order listed on the label
Sugars: Why the glycemic index is important
Sugars are a cause of spikes in the blood that produce cravings.
**Forms of Maltose and Maltodextrin are not classified as a sugar and will appear in many “sugar Free” Products. Beware that they have not been added into foods you are eating…They are much More addictive than Sugar.
1. Fructose (fruit) 22
2. Honey 61
3. Sugar 64
4. High Fructose Corn Syrup 87
5. Maltose 105
6. Maltodextrin 135
**Some abstinent foods may be a problem for the addict, especially if they are over 50 on the glycemic index. This is why we also look at individual binge foods. Steer clear of items with and index of 50 and above and especially over 65 if you are a chronic breaker. Some abstinent foods are higher on the scale that sugar and spike the blood levels more than sugar itself.
“I never heard of bingeing and breaking on broccoli – Author Diane Schwartz
The Glycemic Index of some common Abstinent foods
How fast does my food change to sugar in my bloodstream? Remember SUGAR is a 62.
The faster/higher the spike in blood sugar, the more intense the insulin respsonse and resulting drop in blood sugar and cravings
Remember: Sugar is 62
Veggies:
- Lettuce 10
- Celery 10
- Mushrooms 10
- Cabbage 10
- Broccoli 10
- Onions 10
- Bell peppers 10
- Artichokes 15
- Asparagus 15
- Spinach 15
- Tomatoes 15
- Zucchini 15
- Squash 15
- Cucumber 15
- Bean sprouts 25
- Green Beans 38
- Chickpeas 42
- Peas/ fresh/boiled 49
- Carrots fresh/Boiled 49
- ****************************************
- Kidney beans 52
- Corn /raw/boiled 56
- Potato /raw/boiled 62
- Beets/raw/boiled 69
- Potato /chip/fry 75
- Pumpkin 75
- Broad beans 79
- Potato mashed 86
- Potato baked 93
- Parsnips 97
Grains /Legumes / Cereals
- Pearled Barley 25
- Lima beans 32
- All Bran 44
- Bran Buds 45
- Bulgar 47
- Brown Rice 50
- ************************************
- Quinoa 53
- Plain Oatmeal 55
- Brown Rice. 55
- Ezekiel 4:7 56
- Muesli 56
- Wild rice 57
- Long Grain W Rice 58
- Couscous 65
- Barley Flakes 66
- Shredded Wheat 67
- Millet 71
- Short Grain W Rice 72
- Grape Nuts 75
- Total 76
- Instant Rice 87
- Sticky Rice 90
Fruits
- Cherries 22
- Grapefruit 25
- Prunes 29
- Apple 36
- Pear 38
- Plum 39
- Peach 42
- Dates dry 42
- Banana 48
***************************************
- Kiwi 52
- Mango 55
- Apricot 57
- Papaya 58
- Black grapes 59
- Raisins 64
- Cantalope 65
- Pineapple 66
- Watermellon 72
Dairy
- Plain yogurt 14
- Skim Milk 31
- Heavy Cream 33
- Custard 43
- Milk 4% 50
The recommended livestock fattening pyramid is almost identical to the 1979 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) new recommendations
Its working folks. We are getting Fatter and Fatter resulting in a booming business for Big Pharma, processed food businesses and the healthcare industry ironically all overseen by the FDA
The FDA Food Pyramid Disaster of 1979
The base represents the greatest amounts to the top which represents the least amounts
Notice that only the first two items on the lists are swapped. Everything else is in the parallel position
The feed pyramid to fatten livestock
- has a base of grasses and leafy grasses as the bulk food of largest volume.
- Next in volume grains and plant based proteins
- Next comes vitamins and mineral suppliments
- Next is fat and protein supliments
- Last is food additives
The Human recommended food pyramid
- places the largest bulk of food intake coming from grains-breads, cereals, rice and pasta
- Next in volume comes vegetables and fruits
- Next in volume comes plant and animal based proteins and dairy products
- Last comes fats oils and sweets
Livestock Fattening Pyramid Food Pyramid from the FDA
The Low Fat Fad Is Not Good Science
Many people initially react with anxiety to the idea of a high-protein, healthy fat, low-carb diet. Their thinking has been influenced by the misinformation propagated in the food pyramid by the FDA and the World Health Organization, which has contributed to the obesity epidemic.
Nutrient rich proteins and fats have been demonized on many levels since 1979. Keep an open mind. We are not here to debate the reasons behind this but to look at the results of specific actions. It's important to remind you that current dietary beliefs and practices have brought you to this point in your life. Examining those results, how are those ideas working out for you? Are you open to trying something different? Are you willing to review the links above with an open mind?
Have an open mind. Anyone can commit to trying this new approach for just two weeks. If it doesn’t work, you can always return to your previous habits. We emphasize that this short trial period will provide valuable insights and a new experience which can potentially lead to significant improvements in your health and well-being.
First of all low fat foods are full of chemical additives.
Secondly, healthy fat intake does not store as fat but passes through the body, lubricates bowels and feeds the brain which needs fat. Body fat is gained when the liver stores excess sugars as fat.
Ketosis: As the body begins to use fat for fuel instead of carbohydrates, fat will disappear.
How the Food Pyramid Shaped the Obesity Epidemic:
-Dr.Jordan Peterson
Listen to this informative video Interview:
Overview shortened interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sxEAwWeZc8
Full Interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXmnGtNm0kE
Ditch the cereals. Until the early 1900s oats were used only to fatten livestock for the winter
https://www.facebook.com/DrGundryEnergy/videos/3503779779758064/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
9 Myths that have Destroyed US Health
· A Low-Fat, High-Carb Diet is The Optimal Human Diet
· Cholesterol Rich Foods (Like Eggs) Are Bad For You
· Your Total and LDL Cholesterol Levels Are Good Indicators of
Heart Attack Risk
· Processed Seed- and Vegetable Oils Are Healthy
· Saturated Fat Raises Your Bad Cholesterol and Causes
Heart Disease
· Saturated Fats and Trans Fats Are Similar
· Eating Fat Makes You Fat and High-Fat Diets Are Dangerous
· Processed Margarine is Better Than Natural Butter
· Processed Low-Fat Foods Are Healthy Options
“Our dependency on carbohydrates was further accelerated by misguided official recommendations to eschew saturated fat and cholesterol, to reduce consumption of animal protein, and to substitute low-fat alternatives—which invariably are laden with starch and sugar.” The Big Book of True Recovery from Food Addiction and Beyond: It's Not Broccoli
The obesity index SKYROCKETED at almost the exact same time the low-fat guidelines came out in 1979
Encourage your sponsees to read the entire the entire article:
Obesity in the US
Look at what happened to the lines in 1979 when the guidelines came out that caused the
Low Fat Craze
The Twofold Disease of Addiction
Excerpt from the book "A Program For You:"
Anonymous. A Guide To the Big Book's Design for Living (pp. 21-30). Hazelden Publishing.
"The Doctor's Opinion"
“The Doctor’s Opinion” (pages xxiii–xxx [pages xxv–xxxii]) is the foundation of the whole book Alcoholics Anonymous and of the entire Twelve Step fellowship. To nonalcoholics and nonaddicts, this section may simply seem to be a helpful introductory note, but without it, the entire book doesn’t make sense. In this chapter of our own book we want to examine closely and carefully what Dr. William D. Silkworth wrote. We hope you’ll come to see just how important his words and conclusions will be to your own recovery. Dr. Silkworth was the first physician to fully understand and put into words what an alcoholic’s problem is. He was the first to see the problem fully, clearly, and correctly. This was his main contribution to medicine and to Twelve Step recovery. Misunderstandings about Addiction It sounds strange, but the fact is that in the early part of the twentieth century, no one really understood addiction. By the 1930s, cars, airplanes, radios, and telephones were commonplace, but people were still in the dark about addiction. Even though drugs and alcohol had been around for thousands of years, nobody really knew what the problem was with addicts and alcoholics.
From the time people first started drinking alcohol or using drugs, some of them had problems with it. The majority of people, those who didn’t drink or use drugs, or those who did but didn’t have any problems with them, were puzzled by the situation. It was easy to see that these people had a problem, but it wasn’t clear what the problem was. So the nonaddicted people did their best to figure out what was wrong with the addicts and alcoholics. They came up with all kinds of guesses and theories, most of them pretty far off the mark. Down through history, it’s always been this way: the nonaddicted people have been trying to figure out the addicts and alcoholics. Nonaddicted people would look at an alcoholic or addict and say, “What’s wrong with this person? He must be weak, or sinful, or crazy.” The nonaddicted people had a hard time even figuring out what alcoholics and addicts felt or went through, let alone what their problem might be. As for the addicts and alcoholics, they didn’t care very much what their problem was or what others thought; they just kept on drinking and drugging.
This has been going on for centuries. If you look in the Bible, you’ll find Solomon spent some time describing alcoholics in Proverbs 23:29–35. He referred to them as “those who tarry long over the wine,” and he described them as people who babble and “utter perverse things,” who have red eyes and “wounds without cause,” who end up sleeping anywhere, from right in the sea to on top of a mast, and who, when they wake up miserable from their binge on alcohol, will “seek it” yet again. This description certainly fits alcoholics of our time as well as Solomon’s. So Solomon clearly observed and described the disease of addiction—though he didn’t understand the problem. Dr. Benjamin Rush, back in 1784, was one of the first physicians to say about alcoholism, “I believe that this is a disease process.” That’s an exact quote. He also said, “I believe the answer is total abstinence.” Not an answer—the answer. You might have heard of Dr. Rush before; he was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence. Unfortunately, people didn’t pay much attention to Dr. Rush’s views on addiction; at that time, it was still being regarded as a moral issue, and as a sin.
Dr. Silkworth's Breakthough
It wasn’t until around one hundred and fifty years later that someone really understood the problem, and that someone was Dr. Silkworth. Dr. Silkworth began working with alcoholics in 1930. He worked closely with them, looking for clues and patterns in the ways they lived and acted. He studied his patients carefully, looking for any traits they might share, and he came up with something awfully interesting. He discovered that alcoholics had some driving self-destructive force in them. His breakthrough came when he was able to divide this force into two separate drives: a physical craving, and an obsession in the mind. He wrote, “I believe part of this is in their body and part of it in their mind.” If we look at lines 10–21 on page xxiv [page xxvi] of the Big Book, we learn that Dr. Silkworth confirmed that both the body and mind of the alcoholic are abnormal. This is the first time in medical history where there is any direct reference to the fact that the body is affected as well as the mind. Up until this point, what people had thought and said about addiction had to do entirely with the mind. Alcoholics and addicts were thought to be sinful, corrupt, weak-willed, or lacking in moral character. But as it says on page xxiv [page xxvi], Dr. Silkworth felt that alcoholism was a form of allergy. Alcoholics are people who have an allergic reaction to alcohol. The hundred or so alcoholics—who had solved their drinking problems and who had overseen the writing of the Big Book—agreed that Dr. Silkworth’s explanation made sense and that it explained many things that couldn’t otherwise be explained.
Alcoholism as an Allergy
That word Dr. Silkworth used—allergy—probably gives some people more trouble than any other word in the Big Book, so we want to consider it carefully. It is important that we understand exactly what Dr. Silkworth meant by an allergy.1 Before the two of us came to AA or read the Big Book, we thought we knew what the word allergy meant. We knew that if you were allergic to something, and you ate or drank or breathed some of it, you’d have a physical reaction. If you’re allergic to strawberries and you eat some strawberry cake, you’ll break out in a rash. If you’re allergic to ragweed and you breathe in some ragweed pollen, your eyes will itch and you’ll start to sneeze. When the two of us first came to AA, we were told, “Fellows, you’re allergic to alcohol and you’ll never be able to safely drink it again.” Well, the first thing we thought was, How can we be allergic to alcohol? We’ve been drinking a quart a day. We don’t get rashes from it, and we don’t start sneezing because of it. How can you drink that much of something you’re allergic to? We thought that if you’re allergic to something, it meant you had to have a visible physical reaction to it, like sneezing or hives. But if you look in a dictionary, you’ll see that one of the definitions of an allergy is an abnormal reaction to a food, beverage, or other substance—not necessarily sneezing or itching or vomiting, but any abnormal reaction. Now, the funny thing about having an abnormal reaction is that you can’t tell whether something is abnormal or not until you know what normal is. When we first got into recovery and were told that we were allergic to alcohol, we had to admit that we didn’t know what normal was. We knew what we felt and how we acted when we took a drink, but we didn’t know if that was normal; we didn’t know if other people felt and acted the same way. The only thing we knew about alcohol was the way we drank it and the way those who drank with us drank it. (You see, if people didn’t drink like we did, we didn’t drink with them.)
Eventually, we realized that to find out what was normal, we’d have to talk to people who weren’t affected by alcohol like we were—the so-called social drinkers. We asked some of these people, “How do you feel whenever you take a drink?” And they’d answer something like this: “Well, I get home from work feeling tired, tense, and wrought up. I have a drink or two before dinner and, in a little while, I get a comfortable, relaxing feeling. Then I have dinner, and usually I don’t drink any more that night.” At first we were a little shocked by this because that’s not the way we felt at all when we drank alcohol. When either of us would take a drink, we’d begin to respond instantly. As the alcohol would pass over our lips, they’d begin to tingle. It would cross our teeth, and they’d kind of chatter up and down. When it hit our tongues, we could feel them expand and swell. Then it would reach our cheeks, and they’d flutter in and out a little. We could feel it passing up through our sinus cavities and into our foreheads, and we’d get a feeling in our foreheads that was absolutely, indescribably wonderful. And we wouldn’t even have swallowed it yet—the first sip would still be in our mouths! Once we did swallow, great things would begin to happen. Our chests would seem to grow and expand. Then the alcohol would hit our stomachs and explode like a bomb. We’d immediately feel it racing through our arms. When it reached our hands and fingers, they’d begin to tingle and vibrate. The alcohol would race through our legs, and we’d feel like we were getting taller. Then it would hit our feet and toes, and we’d experience an intense, exciting get-up-and-go-somewhere-and-do-something feeling. Now that’s awfully different from the warm, relaxing feeling most people get when they drink.
Social Drinking and the Myth of Willpower
When we talked to some of the normal, average social drinkers, we also asked them how they felt when they had several drinks in a row. They told us that they would get a slightly tipsy, out-of-control, nauseous feeling. “We don’t like that nauseous feeling,” they said to us, “so two or three drinks are all we have, and all we want.” After we’d talked to enough people and heard them say the same thing, we realized that this is the normal reaction to alcohol. It is a sedative drug, so it’s supposed to make you slightly tipsy and a little out of control. Since alcohol is a destroyer of human tissue, the body is supposed to react to too much of it with nausea. When you put too much of it into the body, the body will vomit it back up to get rid of it. This answered a huge question for us. We had always thought that social drinkers used willpower to stop after only one or two drinks. In fact, that’s one of the things they’d often say to us: “All you have to do is use willpower, like I do.” But they don’t have to use willpower at all because one to three drinks are all they want or need. They get all they want to drink every time they drink, so it’s easy for them to stop. For years we’d look at those normal social drinkers and wonder about them. They would have two drinks, and when somebody offered them a third, they’d say, “Oh, no, I feel this one already,” or “No, I’m getting sleepy,” or “No, it’ll make me sick.” We never understood how people could say these sorts of things because that’s not how alcohol made us feel. When we would drink alcohol, we’d never feel slightly tipsy or out of control or nauseous. We would feel in control. Instead of reacting with nausea, our bodies would say, “Drink some more alcohol.” Our bodies would produce an acute physical craving—one so strong that we couldn’t imagine how we’d be able to stop drinking.
We would plan on having only two drinks, but once either of us had put those two into his system, the physical craving would develop. Then the body would take over, and the mind would no longer be in control. We’d have a third drink, and a fourth, and we’d keep drinking, and soon we’d be in all kinds of trouble. That is an abnormal reaction to alcohol. Please understand that “abnormal” doesn’t mean “bad” or “weak” or “wrong”—it’s just different from what most people experience. The only difference between normal and abnormal is that normal is what most people do. It so happens that about one person in ten reacts to taking a drink in much the same way we do. Those people have an allergic reaction to alcohol, just like we do. If you react to alcohol in pretty much the same way, you’ve got the allergy too. After talking to people, both of us realized that our reaction to alcohol was abnormal, and we began to understand why neither of us could drink without getting drunk. We also began to see how our drinking must have looked to normal people. We had to accept that when it comes to alcohol, we are different from most people. When normal people feel the effect of alcohol, they’re ready and able to stop drinking. But when alcoholics feel the effect of alcohol, they want to keep on drinking. Now, some may be able to white-knuckle it and limit their intake a few times. But inevitably they’ll come to a point where they can’t stop. Eventually, the physical craving will be impossible for their minds to control. Not very difficult—literally impossible. In lines 1–3 of page xxviii [page xxx] in “The Doctor’s Opinion,” Dr. Silkworth says that this physical craving is simply beyond all mental control. We heard someone say once that the difference between social drinkers and alcoholics is that social drinkers go to a party to socialize and may have a drink or two. Alcoholics go to a party to drink and might incidentally socialize as long as they are there. Normal people do not crave alcohol. We alcoholics do.
The Physical Craving Caused by Addiction
The Physical Craving Caused by Addiction We believe that, in Twelve Step meetings, people sometimes don’t talk enough about the physical part of the illness of addiction. Part of our problem as alcoholics and addicts is in our minds, but another part is in our bodies. Most health problems are physical; some are mental or emotional. But addiction is an unusual illness because it affects both the body and the mind. The mental part of the disease is an obsession with alcohol or other drugs; the physical part is an intense craving for our substance of choice. The two aspects of the illness are quite different, as we’ll soon see, but they work closely together. The physical craving is part of our allergy. It’s a reaction to having our substance of choice in our system. Now, notice that the physical craving begins after we use, not before. For example, alcohol in our body makes us crave more alcohol. The initial impulse to take that first drink or drug isn’t physical. We might have a psychological compulsion or an obsession to use, but we cannot experience a physical craving unless we put alcohol or drugs into our body. That’s how the allergy works. In the Big Book, the word “craving” always refers to the body—to the physical craving that occurs only after you’ve taken a drink or a drug. That’s how we’ll use the word in this book too. As for the desires of the mind, we’ll use other words. So now we know that part of our problem as alcoholics and addicts is purely physical. Once we start, we eventually won’t be able to get ourselves to stop. It’s that simple, and it’s a fact. We can’t stop. If you’re an alcoholic or addict and you tell yourself that you can take a drink or a drug and then stop, you’re in trouble.
The one way to stay out of trouble is to avoid that first use.
Dr. Silkworth says this quite plainly, on lines 30–31 of page xxviii [page xxx], in “The Doctor’s Opinion.” He states clearly that the only relief from alcoholism comes from total abstinence. There are no compromises; there is no middle ground. On this same page, on lines 13–23, Dr. Silkworth classifies the different types of alcoholics. Some alcoholics cry in their beer; others get up on the table and start hooting and hollering. Some addicts get into fights; others put the make on each other. But there’s one thing every one of us, regardless of our personality or substance of choice, has in common: at some point, once we start, we’ll go looking for another, and another, and on and on until we’re intoxicated and sick and in trouble. Some of us are born addicted. Other people drink or drug themselves into addiction. For years, some people can use with relative safety, but then they seem to cross a line somewhere and start getting into an uncontrolled territory. But it really doesn’t make any difference how we came by our allergy to alcohol and other drugs, because the end result is the same. It doesn’t matter how long it takes us to get drunk or high, either. Both of us know from the years when we used to drink that if we took a drink at five minutes after ten, by noon we’d be in jail somewhere.
The Answer to the physical allergy is Abstinence
Others go at a much slower pace. Some might take a drink or two today, three or four tomorrow, five or six the next day—it might take them a week to end up in jail or in some other kind of trouble. But it doesn’t make any difference how long it takes because what triggers it all is that first drink or drug they take.
(Triggers for the food addict activate the allergy for about 2 weeks. Most food addicts will use every 2 weeks or more)
If you’re an addict or alcoholic, so long as you try to figure out a way to use without consequences, or a way to stop after brief stints, you’ve got a problem. You’re going to end up drunk or high. As long as you think that you can use safely, that someday you’ll be able to drink or use drugs like most people, you’ll keep drinking or drugging (eating), getting intoxicated, and getting into trouble. This is the truth that Bill W., Dr. Bob, Bill D., and every one of those first one hundred people in AA had to face. They each had to realize for themselves that they were different, that they’d never be able to drink (eat) like most other people. They understood that they could no longer safely take a drink (bite, lick or taste)—not one. Other drug addicts and people with other addictive behaviors have been finding the same thing. There appears to be something in their makeup—possibly their brain chemistry—that leaves them prone to the same kind of craving once they return to their mood-altering drug or behavior—no matter how long they’ve been abstinent.
Realizing this for yourself is the first step in your own recovery.
In fact, Step One of the Twelve Steps says: We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable. The human mind is a funny thing. It will go on thinking in the same direction indefinitely—until you shut the door on that train of thought. The mind will start thinking in a different direction only when information comes along to shut that door for good. This is what made Dr. Silkworth’s discovery so important. He was able to tell alcoholics exactly what they had to do—quit drinking completely—and why—because they were allergic to alcohol. The instant alcoholics realize what’s really wrong with their bodies—that they’ve got an allergy and they’ll never be able to get rid of it—then their thinking changes. Dr. Silkworth’s information closes the door and shuts off the possibility of further drinking. Only when you admit to yourself that you can never take another drink or drug (bite, lick or taste) will you be able to deal with your illness and stop for good. All successful alcohol and other drug treatment programs are based on this one idea: alcoholics or addicts will never be able to drink or use other drugs (pick up their addictive foods) safely for as long as they live.
Notes and Credits
1. While the use of the term allergy is suitable and proper for illustrating the effects that alcohol and drugs have on a person with a substance use disorder (SUD), it is not scientifically accurate. The “allergic reaction” that is mentioned throughout Twelve Step literature serves as an analogy for the compulsive reactivity that a person with a SUD often experiences from substance use. The analogy has helped to convey the immediate and uncontrollable reactions that an addict or alcoholic will experience from substance use. —EDITOR
A Program For You: Anonymous. A Guide To the Big Book's Design for Living (pp. 21-30). Hazelden Publishing.
5 monkeys were placed in a cage as part of an experiment. In the middle of the cage was a ladder with bananas on the top rung. Every time a monkey tried to climb the ladder, the experimenter sprayed all of the monkeys with icy water. Eventually, each time a monkey started to climb the ladder, the other ones pulled him off and beat him up so they could avoid the icy spray. Soon, no monkey dared go up the ladder.
The experimenter then substituted one of the monkeys in the cage with a new monkey. The first thing the new monkey did was try to climb the ladder to reach the bananas. After several beatings, the new monkey learned the social norm. He never knew “why” the other monkeys wouldn’t let him go for the bananas because he had never been sprayed with ice water, but he quickly learned that this behaviour would not be tolerated by the other monkeys.
One by one, each of the monkeys in the cage was substituted for a new monkey until none of the original group remained. Every time a new monkey went up the ladder, the rest of the group pulled him off, even those who had never been sprayed with the icy water.
By the end of the experiment, the 5 monkeys in the cage had learned to follow the rule (don’t go for the bananas), without any of them knowing the reason why (we’ll all get sprayed by icy water). If we could have asked the monkeys for their rationale behind not letting their cage mates climb the ladder, their answer would probably be: “I don’t know, that’s just how its always been done.”
This story, whether real or a fable, captures a pervasive theme in many organizational cultures: We tend to do things the way we’re told they’ve always been done without questioning or revisiting the reason behind it, even long after that reason ceases to exist.
Sometimes we do things a certain way because that is the way our sponsor did it. Lets take a hypothetical. If you ask "why dont we eat cherries...they're abstinent?" This question begs an honest answer. Since there is no food plan explanation as it is not flour, sugar, you can weigh them etc. they fall inside program guidelines... You may be dealing with the story of 5 monkeys.
The 2 Week Starter Plan below has shown great success with the chronic breaker.
2 Week Starter Plans
Get rid of the effects of the physical allergy. You must find a sponsor who is up to speed with this plan and willing to help you with this process.
2 Week Starter Plan for Women
Anyone can commit to this for two weeks - we have had a high success rate with chronic breakers who strictly follow this plan: NO EXCEPTIONS. Deviations of any kind result in restarting at day one.
_______________________________________________________
**Be working with your sponsor during the two weeks on identifying Binge foods or light up foods. Catagorize them as:
Green Light: - Safe. No reaction
Yellow Light: A little triggering but safe at quantity limit
Red Light: Definitely triggering; weighed and measure does not satisfy
_______________________________________________________
*Nothing low fat - low fat foods are chemically enhanced and rich in carbohydrates
*Nothing between meals
*Stay away from artificial sweeteners if sponsee is sensitive to sweets- ask what they
typically run to when they binge
Breakfast
6 oz protein- Eggs, or meat. (No dairy, soy, cheese, yogurt, nuts, beans or
legumes during the first two weeks)
3 oz low glycemic veggies cooked or raw (below 50 on glycemic list- 1st 12 on list is best)
⅓ avocado for healthy fat - brain health and satiation during withdrawals
Lunch
6 oz protein- Eggs, or meat. No dairy, soy, cheese, yogurt, nuts, beans or legumes during the first two weeks.
6 oz low glycemic raw veggies (below 50 on glycemic list- lower is better)
⅓ avocado or 2 TBS Butter / Dressing for fat - brain health and satiation during withdrawals
Dinner
6 oz protein- Eggs, or meat. No dairy, soy, cheese, yogurt, nuts, beans or legumes during the first two weeks.
6 oz low glycemic cooked veggies (below 50 on glycemic list- lower is better)
⅓ avocado or 2 TBS Butter / Dressing for fat - brain health and satiation during withdrawals
2 Week Starter for Men
Anyone can commit to this for two weeks - we have had a high success rate with chronic breakers who strictly follow this plan: NO EXCEPTIONS. Deviations of any kind result in restarting at day one.
______________________________________________________________________________
**Be working with your sponsor during the two weeks on identifying Binge foods or light up foods. Catagorize them as:
Green Light: - Safe. No reaction
Yellow Light: A little triggering but safe at quantity limit
Red Light: Definitely triggering; weighed and measure does not satisfy
______________________________________________________________________________
*Nothing low fat - low fat foods are chemically enhanced and rich in carbohydrates
*Nothing between meals
*Stay away from artificial sweeteners if sensitive to sweets
Breakfast
8 oz protein- Eggs, or meat. (No dairy, soy, cheese, yogurt, nuts, beans or legumes during the first two weeks.)
4 oz low glycemic veggies cooked or raw (below 50 on glycemic list- 1st 12 on list is best)
⅓ avocado for healthy fat - brain health and satiation during withdrawals
Lunch
8 oz protein- Eggs, or meat. No dairy, soy, cheese, yogurt, nuts, beans or legumes during the first two weeks.
4 oz low glycemic raw veggies (below 50 on glycemic list- lower is better)
⅓ avocado or 2 TBS Butter / Dressing for fat - brain health and satiation during withdrawals
Dinner
8 oz protein- Eggs, or meat. No dairy, soy, cheese, yogurt, nuts, beans or legumes during the first two weeks.
4 oz low glycemic cooked veggies (below 50 on glycemic list- lower is better)
⅓ avocado or 2 TBS Butter / Dressing for fat - brain health and satiation during withdrawals.
Now What? I finished the two Week Plan.
We can give you a course of action that has worked for many others. We suggest you continue on your 2 week plan until you get the results of your blood work.
We suggest you treat your abstinence in a scientific, medical manner:
It is possible and even common to be abstinent, in a right sized body and still be at terrible risk of Ahzheimers, stroke, dementia, cardiovascular disease and much more.
1. We urge you to have blood work done
Don't guess or take a stab in the dark. Use your blood test results that determine your metabolism and how you're body responds to nutrition.
2. We suggest you read the book
"How not to get Sick. by Dr Bengamin Bickman
In this book he discusses how to recover your metabolism after messing it up with eating plans and dieting. Based on the scores derived from your blood results, this guide will help calculate your body's needs for your healthy fats, proteins and carbohydrate ratios. No guessing needed or relying on a non-professional to determine your body's nutritional needs.
3. We suggest that you use your blood test results to select the nutritional ratio that supports your metabolic needs:
You will have to evaluate your scores from your blood tests from the
book in order to use AI properly.
Reversing the damage of insulin resistance: A score over 2.0
60% healthy fats
30% protein
10% carbohydrates
Preventing Insulin resistance
55% healthy fats
30% protein
15% carbohydrates
Maintaining if you have already acquired insulin resistance
50% healthy fats
30% protein
20% carbohydrates
4. Plug your results into Freedom from Food
Freedom from food is a no flour and no sugar based AI library that will draw from science, medicine and 12 step recovery to set up a recommended food plan that will give you balanced nutrition based on your own blood test results as well as keep you abstinent from flour and sugar and other carbohydrates.
You will find the link below.
5. Work the Steps the Big Book way
- not to be confused with an AWOL. AWOLS are STEP STUDIES
which differ greatly from working the steps the Big Book Way. Studying the steps in a group to achieve recovery is about as effective as studying folks working out in a gym to achieve 6 pack abs.
We have had some great success with help from AI
Working the Steps
It has been our observation over the last 15 years that the average food addict leaves program at five to seven years if they do not obtain the necessary strength from a higher power and active service to others. Problem eaters can last indefinitely in the fellowship as the food plan solves their problems around weight. For the food addict however, abstinence rips the last bandaid solution off old wounds leaving them open for infection. Since the mental obsessions are left untreated, it is only a matter of time before an addict will eat again without power from a higher power.
WHY?
Page 14 of the Big Book
"For if an alcoholic failed to perfect and enlarge his spiritual life through work and self-sacrifice for others, he could not survive the certain trials and low spots ahead. If he did not work, he would surely drink (break) again, and if he drank (breaks), he would surely die."
Page 47 of the Big Book
"PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE shows that nothing will so much insure immunity from drinking (breaks) as intensive work with other alcoholics (food addicted individuals). It works when other activities fail. This is our twelfth suggestion: Carry this message to other alcoholics (food addicts) !"
For these reasons, it is critical to quickly get the addict through the steps and into service. Taking months and even years to complete step-work put the addict at serious risk or even death.
Stages of disillusionment for the real food addict
- Powerless
- Failure
- Discouragement
- leaving program
You wont last long without the necessary actions.
Willingness is a fleeting commodity for the food addict
A Program of Action
Willingness is a gift from our higher power and fleeting commodity. We sponsor sponsors. Our goal is to get you through the steps and ready to sponsor within 6 months minimally. According to the 12th step, carrying the message is the only way to maintain abstinence long term for the food addict.
We suggest that you start working the Twelve Steps immediately. Abstinence is a gift from our Higher Power that should not be taken lightly. The initial "pink cloud" of good feelings and weight loss will eventually begin lose it’s shine, and by this time, you should to be firmly grounded and helping others in the safety of your Higher Power that grants Neutrality around food. The steps provide a structured path of action to recovery, helping individuals navigate the underlying issues of their addiction. Once peace and serenity begin to happen, joy will become more and more apparent as the void of losing their coping foods fades to the past.
The Need for a Higher Power
Only a Higher Power can truly deliver us from the grips of addiction (Step Three). Human efforts alone are always insufficient (Step One). in overcoming the deep-seated patterns of addictive behavior. Believing in and relying on a Power greater than ourselves is a must for long-term recovery and sanity. This Higher Power offers strength, guidance, and support, helping us navigate the challenges of recovery and achieve lasting freedom from addiction.
By completing the steps and continuously reflecting on these questions, you can develop a deeper understanding of your relationship with food and strengthen their recovery journey with the support of your Higher Power.
The Big Book promise on page 44 - NEUTRALITY!
(Adapted for food addiction)
And we have ceased fighting anything or anyone—even (our addictive foods). For by this time sanity will have returned. We will seldom be interested in (addictive eating). If tempted, we recoil from it as from a hot flame. We react sanely and normally, and we will find that this has happened automatically. We will see that our new attitude toward (food) has been given us without any thought or effort on our part. It just comes! That is the miracle of it. We are not fighting it, neither are we avoiding temptation. We feel as though we had been placed in a position of neutrality—safe and protected. We have not even sworn off. Instead, the problem has been removed. It does not exist for us. We are neither cocky nor are we afraid. That is our experience. That is how we react so long as we keep in fit spiritual condition.
The official "Big Book" from Alcoholic Anonymous (p. 44). Alcoholics Anonymous 4th Edition, World Services, Inc..